The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $333.68 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 71% cheaper – $139.27 vs $472.95
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 65 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 64
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
54%
Min 1% FPS
21
43%
Price, $
$139.27
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
100%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Average FPS
90
100%
Min 1% FPS
49
100%
Price, $
$472.95
29%
Value, $/FPS
$5.25/FPS
54%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
20%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
13%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Vega |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 98.94 GPixel/s |
| 41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 395.8 GTexel/s |
| 1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.66 TFLOPS |
