The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $625.34 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 82% cheaper – $138.38 vs $763.72
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 65 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
29%
Min 1% FPS
21
20%
Price, $
$138.38
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.82/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, $
$763.72
18%
Value, $/FPS
$4.49/FPS
63%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
17%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
6%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
7%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |