The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 7100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $34.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 20% cheaper – $137.99 vs $171.99
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 7100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
74%
Min 1% FPS
21
66%
Price, $
$137.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.81/FPS
93%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
66
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, $
$171.99
80%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
43%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
52%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
29%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.728 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.78 GPixel/s |
| 41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 179 GTexel/s |
| 1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.728 TFLOPS |
