The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7600 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $445.70 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 77% cheaper – $133.29 vs $578.99
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7600
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon PRO W7600 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
46%
Min 1% FPS
21
35%
Price, $
$133.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.72/FPS
100%
Radeon PRO W7600
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, $
$578.99
23%
Value, $/FPS
$5.41/FPS
50%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon PRO W7600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon PRO W7600 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon PRO W7600 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
13%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
13%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
8%
Radeon PRO W7600
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.99 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 156.2 GPixel/s |
| 41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 312.3 GTexel/s |
| 1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.99 TFLOPS |
