The Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile is a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 460. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 13% less energy – 65 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- A faster GPU for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs Radeon RX 460 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
96%
Min 1% FPS
21
95%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
100%
Min 1% FPS
22
100%
Price, $
$172.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.37/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs Radeon RX 460 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs Radeon RX 460 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs Radeon RX 460 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
64 GB/s
57%
Pixel Fillrate
17.31 GPixel/s
90%
Texture Fillrate
34.62 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
1.385 TFLOPS
64%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Radeon Pro Mobile | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 64 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.31 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.2 GPixel/s |
| 34.62 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 67.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.385 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.15 TFLOPS |
