The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $51.99 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 65 vs 170 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Up to 43% cheaper – $69.00 vs $120.99
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Average FPS
47
100%
Min 1% FPS
20
100%
Price, $
$120.99
57%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
65%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Average FPS
41
87%
Min 1% FPS
16
80%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Jun 12th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
74%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
99%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
128.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
13.17 GPixel/s
68%
Texture Fillrate
52.67 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.263 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2011 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 500 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
19.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 13.17 GPixel/s |
| 39.01 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 52.67 GTexel/s |
| 1.248 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.263 TFLOPS |
