Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 688 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 16% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $96.99 vs $114.99
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 35 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 50% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 60 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - $1.92 vs $2.42 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $96.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$114.99
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $114.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
37%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
42%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$149 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |