Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms the cheaper Radeon PRO W7500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon PRO W7500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 77 days older than the cheaper Radeon PRO W7500.
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7500
- Up to 34% cheaper than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - $429.00 vs $653.99
- Up to 2% better value when playing Deathloop than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - $5.50 vs $5.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 70 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 49% better in Deathloop than Radeon PRO W7500 - 116 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon PRO W7500 - 16 vs 8 GB
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
78
67%
Value, $/FPS
$5.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$429
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $429 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.64/FPS
98%
Price, $
$653.99
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $653.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
55%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon PRO W7500 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$429 | MSRP | $499 |
4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
172 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
1700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1344 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |