Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 1002 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Up to 16% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce GTX 1650 - $3.09 vs $3.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
68
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$209.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6849 minutes ago
Buy for $249.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6850 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
83%
Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |