The Radeon Pro W6400 is a slightly faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650, however, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $4.63 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W6400
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 2% cheaper – $224.90 vs $229.53
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro W6400 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, $
$229.53
97%
Value, $/FPS
$3.58/FPS
98%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
97%
Price, $
$224.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.51/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$224.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$343.82
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$273.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.12
In Stock
Radeon Pro W6400 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro W6400 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro W6400 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
87%
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.58 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
71%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
83%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro W6400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
74.59 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
111.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
3.58 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |