The Radeon Pro W5500 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 2100 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $69.94 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 43% cheaper – $94.05 vs $163.99
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
Radeon Pro W5500 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$163.99
57%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
93%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Average FPS
45
62%
Min 1% FPS
18
49%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro W5500 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro W5500 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro W5500 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro W5500
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.224 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
21%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
33%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
24%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
24%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro W5500 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
59.36 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.5 GPixel/s |
163.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 39.01 GTexel/s |
5.224 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.248 TFLOPS |