The Radeon Pro 575 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 575
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 150 vs 350 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce RTX 3090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 575
Jun 5th, 2017
Average FPS
63
39%
Min 1% FPS
31
31%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
162
100%
Min 1% FPS
99
100%
Price, $
$1829.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.29/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 575
Jun 5th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
217 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
35.07 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
140.3 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
4.489 TFLOPS
13%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 575 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 350 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 217 GB/s | Bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 35.07 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| 140.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 556 GTexel/s |
| 4.489 TFLOPS | FP32 | 35.58 TFLOPS |
