The Radeon Pro 575 is a much faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 575
- A much faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 75 vs 150 Watts
Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 575
Jun 5th, 2017
Average FPS
63
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
87%
Min 1% FPS
25
81%
Price, $
$127.67
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$127.67
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$269.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$329.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$457.28
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$379.95
In Stock
Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 575
Jun 5th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
217 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
35.07 GPixel/s
79%
Texture Fillrate
140.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.489 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
52%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
48%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
48%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 575 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $139.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
217 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 35.07 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
140.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
4.489 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |
