The Radeon Pro 5300M is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 290. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 5300M
- Consumes up to 69% less energy – 85 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 290 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Average FPS
63
97%
Min 1% FPS
31
97%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 290 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 290 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon R9 290 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
60%
Pixel Fillrate
40 GPixel/s
66%
Texture Fillrate
100 GTexel/s
66%
FP32
3.2 TFLOPS
66%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 5300M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
85 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 40 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 60.61 GPixel/s |
| 100 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 151.5 GTexel/s |
| 3.2 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.849 TFLOPS |
