The Radeon Pro 460 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 460
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 35 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Average FPS
48
46%
Min 1% FPS
21
36%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, $
$239
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$239.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
18%
Pixel Fillrate
14.51 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
58.05 GTexel/s
19%
FP32
1.858 TFLOPS
19%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Navi |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 81.28 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 58.05 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 1.858 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
