The Radeon Pro 460 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 5090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 460
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 35 vs 575 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 5090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Average FPS
48
20%
Min 1% FPS
21
13%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
242
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, $
$4176.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.25/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$4,176.89
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$4,699.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$4,399.95
In Stock
Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 5090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
14.51 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
58.05 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
1.858 TFLOPS
2%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1637 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 575 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 32 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR7 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 81.28 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1790 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 423.6 GPixel/s |
| 58.05 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1637 GTexel/s |
| 1.858 TFLOPS | FP32 | 104.8 TFLOPS |
