The Radeon Pro 460 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 460
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 35 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Average FPS
48
67%
Min 1% FPS
21
57%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$290.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.04/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
42%
Pixel Fillrate
14.51 GPixel/s
26%
Texture Fillrate
58.05 GTexel/s
42%
FP32
1.858 TFLOPS
42%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $159.00 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
81.28 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
14.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 55.2 GPixel/s |
58.05 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 138 GTexel/s |
1.858 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.416 TFLOPS |