The Radeon 760M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 760M
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 15 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
56
34%
Min 1% FPS
26
25%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
103
100%
Price, $
$1028.81
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.16/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$1,028.81
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$979.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,196.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,098.00
In Stock
Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
41.58 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
83.17 GTexel/s
15%
FP32
5.323 TFLOPS
15%
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.48 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 760M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Not Available | MSRP | $599.00 |
Navi III IGP | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 12 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
41.58 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 198 GPixel/s |
83.17 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 554.4 GTexel/s |
5.323 TFLOPS | FP32 | 35.48 TFLOPS |