The Radeon 680M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 9100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 50 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 680M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 680M
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
55
65%
Min 1% FPS
25
56%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, $
$786.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.36/FPS
100%
Radeon 680M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 680M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 680M vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 680M
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
73%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
27%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 680M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 70.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GPixel/s |
| 105.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 384 GTexel/s |
| 3.379 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS |
