The Radeon 680M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 50 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 680M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 680M
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
55
45%
Min 1% FPS
25
36%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Average FPS
121
100%
Min 1% FPS
70
100%
Price, $
$699
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.77/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$699.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon 680M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 680M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 680M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 680M
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
53%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
42%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
21%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
608.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 680M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 70.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| 105.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 253.1 GTexel/s |
| 3.379 TFLOPS | FP32 | 16.2 TFLOPS |
