The Radeon 660M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 660M
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 40 vs 450 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 660M vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 660M
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
49
29%
Min 1% FPS
21
20%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Jan 27th, 2022
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
106
100%
Price, $
$1979
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.57/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$1,979.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$2,750.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$2,758.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$3,498.00
In Stock
Radeon 660M vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 660M vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 660M vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 660M
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
30.4 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
45.6 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
1.459 TFLOPS
4%
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Jan 27th, 2022
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1010 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
208.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
625 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
40 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 660M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 27th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
40 W | Power Consumption | 450 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 24 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 1010 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 30.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 208.3 GPixel/s |
| 45.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 625 GTexel/s |
| 1.459 TFLOPS | FP32 | 40 TFLOPS |
