The Quadro K5200 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A380 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $49.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Quadro K5200
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the Arc A380
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 26% cheaper – $139.99 vs $189.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 75 vs 150 Watts
Quadro K5200 vs Arc A380
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
$189.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$186.96
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$186.96
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$186.96
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$139.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$139.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$229.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$217.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$219.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Quadro K5200 vs Arc A380 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Quadro K5200 vs Arc A380 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Quadro K5200 vs Arc A380 in core GPU performance specifications
Quadro K5200
Jul 22nd, 2014
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
37.01 GPixel/s
56%
Texture Fillrate
148 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.553 TFLOPS
85%
Arc A380
Jun 14th, 2022
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
186 GB/s
97%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
89%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Quadro K5200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A380 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 22nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 14th, 2022 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
Quadro Kepler (Kx200) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 96-bit |
192.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 186 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
37.01 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 65.6 GPixel/s |
148 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 131.2 GTexel/s |
3.553 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.198 TFLOPS |