The NVS 5200M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the NVS 5200M
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 25 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of the RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
NVS 5200M vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Feb 12th, 2024
Average FPS
97
100%
Min 1% FPS
53
100%
Price, $
$705.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.27/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$705.93
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$739.99
In Stock
NVS 5200M vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The NVS 5200M vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The NVS 5200M vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation in core GPU performance specifications
NVS 5200M
Jun 1st, 2012
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
10 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
240 GFLOPS
2%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Feb 12th, 2024
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
102.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
187.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
NVS 5200M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2024 |
Not Available | MSRP | $649.00 |
NVS Mobile (x200M) | Generation | Workstation Ada (x000A) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
25 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
Memory | ||
1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
2.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 102.2 GPixel/s |
10 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 187.4 GTexel/s |
240 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12 TFLOPS |