Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Boost Clock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Buy on Amazon
$199.99
In Stock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
$169.99
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
Buy on Amazon
$270.19
In Stock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
$288.63
In Stock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
$261.2
In Stock
Boost Clock
Buy on Amazon
$217.03
In Stock
Same as Founder's Edition
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $599
Availability
MSRP in USD: $599
Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3070 Ti outperforms the cheaper GeForce RTX 3050 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce RTX 3050 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is 218 days older than the cheaper GeForce RTX 3050.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
- Up to 70% cheaper than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti - $179.99 vs $599.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti - $3.53 vs $7.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti - 130 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Performs up to 65% better in Sons Of The Forest than GeForce RTX 3050 - 84 vs 51 FPS
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce RTX 3050
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
51
60%
Value, $/FPS
$3.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value Winner
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3050 Eagle OC 6G Graphics Card, 2X WINDFORCE Fans, 6GB GDDR6 96-bit GDDR6, GV-N3050EAGLE OC-6GD Video Card
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2693 minutes ago
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Desktop • May 31st, 2021
FPS
84
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.14/FPS
49%
Price, $
$599.99
29%
FPS Winner
MSI Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8GB GDRR6X 256-Bit HDMI/DP Nvlink Tri-Frozr 2 Ampere Architecture OC Graphics Card (RTX 3070 Ti Ventus 3X 8G OC)
Buy for $599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce RTX 3050
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Desktop • May 31st, 2021
Theoretical Performance
GeForce RTX 3050
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
33%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
41%
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Desktop • May 31st, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 31st, 2021 |
| GeForce 30 | Generation | GeForce 30 |
$249 | MSRP | $599 |
| 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 12-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6X |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s |
| 1552 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1575 MHz |
1777 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1188 MHz |
Builds Using GeForce RTX 3050 or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Sons Of The Forest, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
44 FPS
$17.05/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Ryzen 7 5700
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$749.99
In Stock
45 FPS
$14.44/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i5-12400
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$649.99
In Stock
40 FPS
$20.27/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$810.89
In Stock
45 FPS
$20/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i5-12400F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$899.99
In Stock
46 FPS
$20.22/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i5-13400F
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$929.99
In Stock
49 FPS
$23.92/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i7-13700
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,172
In Stock
46 FPS
$18.89/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i5-13400F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$869
In Stock
52 FPS
$44.79/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i9-14900K
64 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$2,329
In Stock
45 FPS
$18.51/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i5-12400F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$832.73
In Stock
81 FPS
$16.78/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Core i7-12700KF
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,359
In Stock
Similar GPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
