Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is 2084 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Radeon R9 Nano - 31 vs 30 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 75 vs 175 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
66.0625%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
26.425781250000004%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 30 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 712 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1057 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
