Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER outperforms GeForce MX450 25W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is 291 days older than GeForce MX450 25W.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 25 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Performs up to 89% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than GeForce MX450 25W - 66 vs 35 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W - 6 vs 2 GB
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
FPS
66
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $189.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Aug 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
34%
Texel Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
33%
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $229 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
720 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
930 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |