Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms GeForce MX330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 65 days newer than GeForce MX330.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 10 vs 30 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 5% better in Lost Ark than GeForce MX330 - 175 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX330 - 4 vs 2 GB
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce MX330
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 15th, 2020 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 16 Mobile |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | None |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 160 GB/s |
1531 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 930 MHz |
1594 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
