Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms GeForce MX130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 1324 days older than GeForce MX130.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 2 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 608% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than GeForce MX130 - 85 vs 12 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce MX130 - 19 vs 30 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce MX130
Mobile • Nov 17th, 2017
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX130
Mobile • Nov 17th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
9.512 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
28.54 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
26.282590412111016%
Texel Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
17.51927119831815%
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
1109 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
| 1189 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |
