Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 960 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 960 is 447 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 62 vs 56 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 83% cheaper than GeForce GTX 960 - $54.99 vs $319.0
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 - 50 vs 120 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $319 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Buy for $54.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
16.551724137931036%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
24.830879426979706%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
Jan 22nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
GeForce 900 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
112.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
1127 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 730 MHz |
1178 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 780 MHz |
1753 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |