Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GTX 760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 252 days newer than GeForce GTX 760.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 170 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than GeForce GTX 760 - 28 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 - 3 vs 2 GB
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 760
Desktop • Jun 25th, 2013
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 760
Desktop • Jun 25th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
24.77 GPixel/s
82%
Texel Fillrate
99.07 GTexel/s
94%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 700 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$249 | MSRP | $279 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 192.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
980 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1032 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
