Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 153 days newer than GeForce GTX 650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 65 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 1000% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 650 - 11 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 - 4 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GTX 650
Desktop • Nov 27th, 2013
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 650
Desktop • Nov 27th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
8.464 GPixel/s
12.991557943207981%
Texel Fillrate
33.86 GTexel/s
18.89508928571429%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1058 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
