Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms GeForce GTX 650 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 693 days newer than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 110 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 400% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 650 Ti - 5 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti - 2 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Desktop • Oct 9th, 2012
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Desktop • Oct 9th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
14.85 GPixel/s
50%
Texel Fillrate
59.39 GTexel/s
57%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 9th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | $249 |
| 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
928 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1350 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
