Key Differences
In short — Arc A310 outperforms GeForce GTX 460M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A310 is 4422 days newer than GeForce GTX 460M.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 267% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than GeForce GTX 460M - 33 vs 9 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M - 30 vs 50 Watts
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M - 4 vs 1.5 GB
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 460M
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Arc A310
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Alchemist |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 1.5 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 60 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
| 625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |
