Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1983 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 88% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon R7 250 - 77 vs 41 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 55 vs 120 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
41
53%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1375 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
Mar 14th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$219 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |