Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 1806 days older than GeForce GTX 1660.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 6 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield IV than GeForce GTX 1660 - 236 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 19 vs 120 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1660
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 14th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $219 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
| 1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |
