Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W5700 is 250 days newer than GeForce GTX 1660.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5700 - 120 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Performs up to 84% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 1660 - 35 vs 19 FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 8 vs 6 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $197.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
71.22194513715712%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
58.034724787587734%
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 14th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$219 | MSRP | $799 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
192.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1880 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |