Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 688 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 800% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 9 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - $17.22 vs $79.99 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 48% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $79.99 vs $154.99
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 35 vs 75 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.99
51%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11973 minutes ago
Buy for $79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11973 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$149 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |