Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 910 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 50 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 94% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 122 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 8 vs 4 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |