Key Differences
In short — Arc A770 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A770 is 910 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Arc A770 - 30 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A770
- Performs up to 142% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 87 vs 36 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 16 vs 4 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
87
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$561
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $561 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
11%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | Intel Arc A770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $329 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2100 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |