Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 2381 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 138% better in Remnant II than Radeon R7 250 - 19 vs 8 FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 30 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6315 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |