Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W5700 is 148 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5700 - 30 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Performs up to 36% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 75 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
FPS
75
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$232.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $232.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3783 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
29%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
26%
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $799 |
None | Outputs | 5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1880 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |