Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms GeForce GT 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is 3885 days newer than GeForce GT 620.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile - 49 vs 115 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- Performs up to 4300% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 620 - 44 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 - 8 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
2.8 GPixel/s
3.0864197530864197%
Texel Fillrate
11.2 GTexel/s
6.174200661521499%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| 700 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1545 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1890 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
