Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A750 is 3802 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 620.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Up to 38% cheaper than Arc A750 - $149.0 vs $239.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing F1 23 than Arc A750 - $0.93 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 49 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 30% better in F1 23 than GeForce GT 620 - 209 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 - 8 vs 1 GB
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
FPS
161
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12518 minutes ago
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12516 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 600 | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
700 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |