Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 520 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 520 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A750 is 4200 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 520.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- Up to 67% cheaper than Arc A750 - $79.99 vs $239.99
- Up to 46% better value when playing Dota 2 than Arc A750 - $0.58 vs $1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 29 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 60% better in Dota 2 than GeForce GT 520 - 222 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 - 8 vs 1 GB
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
FPS
139
62%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11835 minutes ago
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11834 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 500 | Generation | Alchemist |
$59 | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |