Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A380 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 520 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A380 is 4080 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 520.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- Up to 20% cheaper than Arc A380 - $79.99 vs $99.99
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Arc A380 - 29 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Performs up to 68% better in No Man's Sky than GeForce GT 520 - 94 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 26% better value when playing No Man's Sky than GeForce GT 520 - $1.06 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 - 6 vs 1 GB
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12921 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
FPS
94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
79%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12920 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | vs | Intel Arc A380 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 14th, 2022 |
GeForce 500 | Generation | Alchemist |
$59 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 96-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 186 GB/s |
810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |