Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms GeForce GT 425M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 1259 days newer than GeForce GT 425M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 23 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 0% better in League of Legends than GeForce GT 425M - 366 vs 365 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M - 2 vs 1 GB
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce GT 425M
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 560 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
