Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms GeForce GT 330M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 1696 days newer than GeForce GT 330M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 23 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 19% better in F1 22 than GeForce GT 330M - 64 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M - 2 vs 1 GB
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GT 330M
Mobile • Jan 10th, 2010
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 330M
Mobile • Jan 10th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
15.656909462219195%
Texel Fillrate
9.2 GTexel/s
8.949416342412452%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 10th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| GeForce 300M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 575 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
