Key Differences
In short — Radeon HD 7950 outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon HD 7950 is 805 days newer than GeForce GT 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Radeon HD 7950 - 69 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Performs up to 10% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than GeForce GT 240 - 103 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 3 vs 1 GB
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 31st, 2012
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
4.4 GPixel/s
17.1875%
Texel Fillrate
17.6 GTexel/s
19.642857142857146%
Desktop • Jan 31st, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
25.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
89.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | vs | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 31st, 2012 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Southern Islands |
$80 | MSRP | $449 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
550 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
850 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |