Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 950 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 950 is 2032 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 58 vs 90 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Performs up to 4% better in War Thunder than GeForce GT 220 - 215 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 2 vs 1 GB
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
GeForce GTX 950
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
12.62493424513414%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
25.25429673798667%
GeForce GTX 950
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 20th, 2015 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 900 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1024 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1188 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1653 MHz |
