Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is 2396 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 58 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Performs up to 110% better in Starfield than GeForce GT 220 - 21 vs 10 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 3 vs 1 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
FPS
21
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$349
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36081 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
5.855086606489387%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
11.707317073170733%
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 18th, 2016 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1506 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1708 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2002 MHz |