Key Differences
In short — Arc A310 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A310 is 4642 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 26% better in Rocket League than GeForce GT 220 - 234 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 30 vs 58 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Arc A310
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
17.142857142857142%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
25.71428571428572%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Alchemist |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |
